- Information
- AI Chat
A Brief Summary Of A Civil Action For Reading And Studying
StuDocu Summary Library EN
Studocu University - USA
Recommended for you
Students also viewed
- Preguntas rebelion granja
- Gaventa - Summary Power and Powerlessness : Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley
- Summary - Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
- American Education By Joel H Spring In Detail Concepts
- Development and social change a global perspective Mc Michael - Chapter 7 summary
- Development and social change a global perspective Mc Michael - Chapter 5 summary
Related documents
- Chalmers What is this thing called science - Alcestis
- Maus Study Notes - Summary Maus - Maus
- The Theory of Moral Sentiments Summary and Analysis by Parts - The Second Shift
- Playing Lev Manovich - Summary The Language of New Media
- How To Lie With Statistics Summary - How to Read a Paper
- Culture AND Imperialism analysis - David Copperfield
Preview text
A Brief Summary of A Civil Action Chapters 1 and 2: The Woburn Families From 1966 to 1986, more than a dozen cases of childhood leukemia hit the small town of Woburn, Massachusetts. In the late 1970s, civil engineers discovered that local wells G and H were contaminated with several suspected carcinogens, including trichloroethylene (TCE). The wells were subsequently shut down. The town had a long history of industrial activity, including a number of tanneries. Two major corporations, W. Grace Co. and Beatrice Foods, owned factories and plants in the area. A group of the parents of children who had developed leukemia (some survived, though many died) sought legal advice. They consulted Joe Mulligan, a Boston lawyer, and signed his firm to a contingency contract to pursue a suit against anyone responsible for the contamination of the local wells. In early 1981, the Center for Disease Control issued a report on the Woburn cancer cluster that showed the cancer rate was at least seven times higher than normal, but did not definitively connect the well contamination with the leukemia cases. Chapter 3: The Lawyer Jan Schlictmann was a young lawyer with Joe law firm, Reed Mulligan, early in the Woburn case. He had bounced around a number of jobs before discovering an interest in the law and attending law school. He attempted to start his own firm, but ended up working at Reed Mulligan in Boston only a few years later. The Woburn case had been neglected at the firm, and Schlictmann began working on it. He worked closely with Kevin Conway at the firm, who warned him that the Woburn case was black As the statute of limitations on the case approached, Schlictmann teamed up with a firm in Washington, DC, that was looking for an environmental case to pursue. He turned the case over to the firm but stayed on as local counsel. They filed a complaint eight days before the statute of limitations ran in May 1982, claiming that Beatrice Foods and the W. Grace Company were responsible for contaminating the wells and there causing the leukemia cluster in Woburn. Chapter 4: Rule 11 Jerome Facher was an experienced trial lawyer in Boston. His firm represented Beatrice Foods, which owned the Riley Tannery north of Woburn. William Cheeseman worked for another large Boston firm that represented W. Grace Co., which owned a manufacturing plant north of Woburn. Cheeseman specialized in strategy rather than trials, and filed a Rule 11 motion against Schlictmann and the firm in an effort to end the case immediately. The motion charged Schlictmann with filing a frivolous and unfounded lawsuit, and with other suspect ethical behavior such as soliciting clients. The judge, Walter Jay Skinner, held a hearing on the motion. Schlictmann refused to submit to Cheeseman on the theory that doing so would violate his obligations to his clients. The hearing was conducted Judge Skinner based on submitted questions Cheeseman, and the Rule 11 motion was denied. Chapter 5: Orphans and Dogs After successfully negotiating a large settlement in a different case, and seeing the credit and most of the proceeds go to a senior partner who had little to do with the case, Schlictmann decided to leave Reed Mulligan and start his own firm. Kevin Conway went with him, and requested that Schlictmann get rid of the Woburn case, but Schlictmann refused. In the new first major case, Schlictmann won a million verdict in a personal injury case. He turned his attention to the Woburn case, which had lain dormant for over a year. A Harvard study had come out showing that people exposed to wells G and H had suffered a number of adverse health effects, and the study concluded that there was a strong possibility the contamination was linked to the leukemia cases. William Cheeseman filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that the plaintiffs could not prove their allegations scientifically, and therefore the case could not go to a jury. Judge Skinner denied the motion. Cheeseman later impleaded another defendant, Unifirst, who also had a manufacturing plant near the wells. Unifirst quickly settled with Schlictmann for just over a million dollars, and the Woburn families agreed to use a large portion of that settlement to finance the rest of the case against W. Grace and Beatrice Foods. Chapter 6: Discovery Both sides began conducting depositions. After hearing some of the family members, Jerome Facher feared that he would lose the case if the families were allowed to testify. Depositions of workers at the plants revealed that some chemicals had been dumped into the ground, and that some managers who had been deposed early in the case had withheld information or lied. Based on this, Schlictmann notified the U. Attorney, and a federal investigation began. Further discovery showed that a significant amount of chemicals had been disposed of directly into the ground. Schlictmann deposed John Riley, owner of the Riley Tannery, who denied using TCE and denied any knowledge of polluting the 15 acres of land around the factory. Depositions of other townspeople showed that dumping had taken place for years on the 15 acres Riley owned, but Schlictmann was not able to uncover much of anything in terms of documentation or written evidence. Chapter 7: The Woodshed firm collected medical records from as many of the family members as possible. He hired medical experts to review the documents and to potentially testify at trial. The bills related to the case mounted, in part because Schlictmann spared no expense on experts, medical tests, geological tests of the dump sites, and exhibits to be prepared for trial. With five months left before trial, the firm had spent almost a million dollars on the case. It had to borrow money repeatedly to continue to finance the case. During depositions of the experts, Schlictmann objected strongly to certain lines of questioning, which he thought the lawyers had all agreed not to pursue until a later date. Following tirades in the deposition room, Jerome Facher filed a motion to have Judge Skinner censure Schlictmann. Judge Skinner strongly rebuked Schlictmann for his unseemly behavior in the depositions, but did not censure him. Following the conference with the judge, Facher Just before trial, a member of team tried again to settle with Schlictmann. He offered million total for a dismissal of Beatrice Foods. When Schlictmann did not accept, he offered to try to get million. Schlictmann decided to before taking the offer to his clients. He countered for million, but never heard back from the defendants. Chapter 10: The Trial The trial began with a packed courtroom. opening statement was extremely powerful, and left the defense lawyers worried. Facher and Cheeseman both countered with statements focused on the lack of proof of contamination the companies. Schlictmann presented his case against the companies, with frequent objections from the defense lawyers. Schlictmann called John Riley, the owner of the tannery, to the stand, with plans to expose him as a liar. Schlictmann was unable to get anything useful out of Riley, and began asking questions that violated rules of evidence and gave Riley room to explain answers in a positive light. Schlictmann had more success with his examination of witnesses regarding W. Grace. As the trial went on, the finances degraded. The phones were cut off at one point, and creditors were in constant communication demanding payment. Eight weeks into trial, Schlictmann called one of his key witnesses, a groundwater expert named George Pinder. Pinder testified about how the contaminants had traveled through the groundwater to the wells. On however, Facher used deposition to contradict many points Pinder had raised on the witness stand. Facher dissected calculations and explanations, which were in some parts clearly mistaken. opinion that the wells drew water from the contaminated land was later shown to be correct an EPA report, but the report was published two years after the trial. The defense began presenting its case in June. Meanwhile, firm settled another small case and used the funds to pay off its most pressing bills. experts disputed the timing of the contamination and shared work that showed Beatrice Foods could not have contaminated the well water before the wells were shut down. cross examinations were effective in weakening their testimony, and he nearly succeeded in having several of the testimony stricken from the record. firm was so deep in debt at this point that all employees were walking to work, car had been seized, and his condo and several homes of partners in the firm had been signed away as collateral for bank loans. The last witness for the defense was a hydrology expert who testified that water could not have gotten from W. land to the wells. His testimony was very troublesome for Schlictmann, but Schlictmann was able to force him into admitting that Beatrice land probably did contaminate the wells. Then Charlie Nesson showed that the calculations were wrong, and Schlictmann was able to entirely discredit his testimony just as the trial came to a close. Following the close of evidence, Judge Skinner ruled on several motions for a directed verdict. His rulings excluded some evidence that undercut the case against Beatrice Foods but had no effect on the case against W. Grace. Judge Skinner then worked with the lawyers to prepare questions for the jury to consider in coming to a verdict. Closing statements began on the 77th day of the trial. The defense lawyers spoke first, discussing the lack of proof that contaminants had made it from the land to the wells. closing statement was interrupted objections from Facher, and even his partners found his closing confusing and without direction. Chapter 11: The Vigil The jury began deliberations after receiving instructions from Judge Skinner. Their deliberations lasted over two weeks, in part because of confusion over the questions they were expected to answer. At one point, the jury told the judge they were deadlocked and could not reach a decision, but after a few more days they were able to agree. The jury found that there was not enough evidence to find Beatrice Foods liable, but that there was enough to find W. Grace liable for polluting the wells. One key finding from the jury stated that W. Grace could not be held responsible for any contamination before September 1973, which meant that three of the children who had developed leukemia before 1973 would probably be dropped from the case in the second phase of the trial. partners realized that their only hope for victory was to settle the case. Chapter 12: The Settlement After the jury verdict in the first phase, Schlictmann and his partners met to discuss what they would settle the case for. They met with an executive from W. Grace and presented a demand totaling million. The executive said it was too high but it was a constructive proposal. They met again in New York the following week. The executive offered them million. partners insisted he take it, or at least ask the families, but Schlictmann refused. After another week, Schlictmann met again with the executive, and presented a demand of million. The executive took several days to confer with the board of directors, but never returned an offer. firm was deep in debt and on the edge of bankruptcy. At the beginning of the second phase of the trial, the W. Grace defense team submitted motions to dismiss some of the plaintiffs whose children had gotten sick before 1973. On the day of the expected ruling, Schlictmann asked the judge to wait to give them a chance to settle the case. The judge agreed. W. Grace came back with an offer of million, which firm accepted. Chapter 13: Buff The settlement money was divided among the families after million paid off the expenses of the trial, and million went to the firm as legal fees. Each family received just under The EPA report came out after the trial, and showed that both Beatrice Foods and W. Grace had contaminated the well water. In preparing an appeal, partners found a document that had not been given to them during trial. The report showed significant testing W. Grace at the site that revealed evidence bolstering the case. Schlictmann sought a new trial based on the withholding of the document, but Judge Skinner denied the motion. The appeal decision came back upholding the verdict but requiring Judge Skinner to delve further into the issue of the withheld report.
A Brief Summary Of A Civil Action For Reading And Studying
Course: StuDocu Summary Library EN
University: Studocu University - USA
This is a preview
Access to all documents
Get Unlimited Downloads
Improve your grades
Why is this page out of focus?
Why is this page out of focus?
Students also viewed
- Preguntas rebelion granja
- Gaventa - Summary Power and Powerlessness : Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley
- Summary - Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
- American Education By Joel H Spring In Detail Concepts
- Development and social change a global perspective Mc Michael - Chapter 7 summary
- Development and social change a global perspective Mc Michael - Chapter 5 summary
Related documents
- Chalmers What is this thing called science - Alcestis
- Maus Study Notes - Summary Maus - Maus
- The Theory of Moral Sentiments Summary and Analysis by Parts - The Second Shift
- Playing Lev Manovich - Summary The Language of New Media
- How To Lie With Statistics Summary - How to Read a Paper
- Culture AND Imperialism analysis - David Copperfield