- Information
- AI Chat
Was this document helpful?
Chapter 8 Free Appropriate Public Education
Course: Legal/Ethical Aspects in Special Education (SPED 525)
5 Documents
Students shared 5 documents in this course
University: University of North Dakota
Was this document helpful?
Chapter 8: Free Appropriate Public Education
Study Guide
Short Answer (3 points each)
1. In the Rowley decision, the Supreme Court developed a twofold test when determining if
a student with disabilities is provided an appropriate education. Explain the Rowley case
and both parts of this test. How can schools ensure that they meet each part? The first
part of the twofold test is seeing if the school district personnel has complied with the
procedures of IDEA. And the second part is seeing if the school has developed an IEP that is
reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits. This also requires
the courts to examine the child’s IEP and the progress he/she has made whether the IEP
made was the best reasonable calculations for the child to make progress. If these criteria
are met then the school has done their part.
2. There are important implications for school officials from the Lovaas cases regarding a
FAPE. List and explain two of these implications.
Parents must play an important role of the child’s educational decisions. This is a procedural
violation against the child. Another implication is to cause depravation of educational
benefits against the child. This is also a procedural violation. To this date the court is still
hearing cases based of these violations of a child’s education.
3. What is a related service? When must a school provide a related service? What are the
limitations on related services? Related services are supportive services that are related to
assist the child with a disability to benefit from special education. The school must provide
related services when the student has a diagnosed disability and the related services are
required for the student. There are some limitations on these related services, specifically
implanted devices such as cochlear implants.
4. Briefly discuss predetermination. How can IEP teams avoid predetermination?
Predetermination is the districts presentation of parents in one placement option and is
unwilling to be open to consider other alternatives. The IEP team can avoid
predetermination by keeping an open mind, using an agenda to guide the meeting, carefully
consider what the parents input is, don’t automatically discount other recommendations
made by other agencies or personal, and finally keep good documentation.