Skip to document
This is a Premium Document. Some documents on Studocu are Premium. Upgrade to Premium to unlock it.

BLaw Final Answer Key

Final exam answer key
Course

Business Law (LEB 323)

38 Documents
Students shared 38 documents in this course
Academic year: 2012/2013
Uploaded by:
0followers
2Uploads
18upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.
  • JP
    Thanks it was very helpful

Preview text

Business Law Final Answer Key PART 1: Multiple Choice and T/F Questions 1. Louann pushes Molly, who falls and breaks her wrist. Louann is liable for the injury   a. if Louann intended to push Moly.   b. only if Louann did not intend to break Moly’s wrist.   c. only if Louann had a bad motive for pushing Moly.   d. only if Louann intended to break Moly’s wrist. ANSWER:  a 2. Power Trucking Company operates a fleet of fuel trucks. When one of the trucks is positioned to receive a load, it strikes a storage tank owned by Quality Fuel, Inc. For the cost of repairing the damage to the tank, Quality Fuel is most likely to be awarded   a. compensatory damages.   b. punitive damages.   c. contingency fees.   d. general damages. ANSWER:  a 3. Oxley throws a rock intending to hit Pieter but misses and hits Ricardo who sustains an injury. Ricardo can most likely recover the cost of his injury from Oxley in a suit based on the tort theory of   a. battery.   b. conversion.   c. invasion of privacy.   d. trespass. ANSWER:  a 4. After a dinner at Rosario’s Italian Café, Susie believes that she was overcharged and shoves Theo, the waiter. Theo sues Susie, alleging that the shove was a battery. Susis is liable   a. if Rosario’s did not actually overcharge Susis.   b. if the shove was offensive.   c. if Susis acted out of malice.   d. under no circumstances—there was no physical injury. ANSWER:  b 5. Jon wants to buy Kim’s land, but she refuses to sell. Jon begins using subpoenas, court orders, and other formal legal procedures in an unrelenting effort to force Kim to sell. This is   a. abuse of process.   b. appropriation.   c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.   d. not a tort. ANSWER:  a 6. Diego is arrested for a theft committed by someone who stole his identity. A court orders his release, but due to a police error in Diego’s paperwork, he is held in jail for a month. The police are most likely liable for   a. abuse of process.   b. false imprisonment.   c. malicious prosecution.   d. none of the choices. ANSWER:  b 7. In studying the business law, students also review ethics in a business context. Ethics includes the study of what constitutes   a. right or wrong behavior.   b. financially rewarding behavior.   c. legal behavior.   d. religious behavior. ANSWER:  a 8. According to the view that Applied Engineering Corporation is a “citizen,” the firm is expected to   a. participate in bettering communities and society.   b. primarily generate revenue for its owners.   c. have no responsibility other than profit maximization.   d. efficiently allocate scarce resources. ANSWER:  a 9. Daisy works for eMarketing, Inc. Her job includes putting “spin” on the firm’s successes and failures. In this context, ethics has to do with how businesspersons, in making their decisions, apply   a. legal doctrine.   b. moral and ethical principles.   c. corporate guidelines.   d. financial priorities. ANSWER:  b 10. In studying the business law, students also review ethics in a business context. Ethics includes the study of what constitutes   a. right or wrong behavior.   b. financially rewarding behavior.   c. legal behavior. ANSWER:  a 16. Ryan is accused of auto theft. Ryan refuses to give information related to his alleged criminal activities because he suspects it will be used to prosecute him. This is   a. duress.   b. entrapment.   c. the privilege against selfincrimination.   d. necessity. ANSWER:  c 17. Gilda is accused of conspiracy to defraud. She is given an opportunity to object to the charge before a judge. She is also given the opportunity to confront and cross-examine witnesses and to present her own witnesses. These procedures represent   a. a reasonable expectation of privacy.   b. the prohibition against double jeopardy.   c. due process of law.   d. the privilege against self-incrimination. ANSWER:  c 18. Erica, a police officer, wants to search the offices of Debit & Credit, Accountants. She asks Judge Bernie to issue a warrant. Under the Fourth Amendment, no warrant for a search can be issued without   a. double jeopardy.   b. probable cause.   c. reasonable doubt.   d. immunity. ANSWER:  b 19. Kelly is accused of receiving stolen property. She can refuse to provide information about her allegedly criminal activities   a. if she suspects the information will be used to prosecute her.   b. if the police do not promise to keep the information confidential.   c. if the information is “fruit of the poisonous tree.”   d. under no circumstances. ANSWER:  c 20. Gayla tells Franco that she will pay him $50 to haul the trimmed tree limbs and other lawn debris from her property. Franco’s acceptance is complete   a. as soon as he says he will do the job.   b. once he starts to work.   c. only after he hauls away the debris.   d. when he hears the offer. ANSWER:  c 21. Shelby offers to make digital copies of Relay Company’s business conference videotapes, CDs, DVDs, and other media for $500. Under the mailbox rule, Relay’s acceptance by e-mail will be considered effective when   a. received.   b. sent.   c. followed up by a confirmation letter sent by regular mail.   d. composed on a Relay computer. ANSWER:  b 22. Pacific Charter Company offers to provide an air-conditioned bus to Quincy’s tour group for $1,500 plus the cost of the fuel. The mailbox rule applies if Quincy accepts the offer by   a. e-mail.   b. phone.   c. regular mail.   d. any of the choices. ANSWER:  c 23. Green River Gas Company offers to sell Far East Energy, Ltd., a certain quantity of liquefied natural gas. If Far East sends an acceptance via Green River’s authorized mode of communication, it will be effective when it is   a. in transit.   b. received.   c. sent.   d. written. ANSWER:  c 24. Safe4U Lenses, Inc., assures ThruVu Optical Company that Safe4U’s lenses will not crack within a certain range of pressure. ThruVu buys the lenses to prescribe to its customers. When cracks develop within the stated range, ThruVu files a suit against Safe4U. The court is most likely to rule in favor of   a. Safe4U, because its statement was an expression of opinion.   b. Safe4U, because ThruVu chose Safe4U’s products voluntarily.   c. ThruVu, because Safe4U’s statement was an express warranty.   d. ThruVu, because Safe4U’s statement constituted puffery. ANSWER:  c 25. Aerospace, Inc., makes and sells flight navigation equipment, through independent salespersons, to retailers for resale to consumers. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act covers   a. implied warranties, oral statements, and written promises.   b. only implied warranties that consumers are aware of.   c. only a salesperson’s oral statements.   a. an example of the doctrine.   b. an exception based on contract theory.   c. an exception based on public policy.   d. an exception based on tort theory. ANSWER:  c 31. Frank is an employee of Guitar Makers, LLC. Guitar’s employee manual states that workers, such as Frank, will be dismissed only for good cause. With respect to the employment-at-will doctrine, this is   a. an example of the doctrine.   b. an exception based on contract theory.   c. an exception based on public policy.   d. an exception based on tort theory. ANSWER:  b 32. Leon, Mia, Nestor, and Orina are employees of different-sized employers in different industries. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, all employees in covered industries must be paid per hour   a. a minimum wage.   b. a maximum wage.   c. overtime pay.   d. the same amount. ANSWER:  a 33. Hunter is seventeen years old. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Hunter cannot work   a. in the entertainment industry.   b. in a hazardous occupation.   c. for her parents.   d. in the agriculture industry. ANSWER:  b 34. If an action is legal, it is ethical.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  False 35. If people merely comply with the law, they are acting at the lowest ethical level society will tolerate.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  True 36. An action may be legal but not ethical.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  True 37. Acting in good faith gives a business firm a better chance of defending its actions in court.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  True 38. Ethical reasoning is the process through which an individual links his or her moral convictions or ethical standards to the particular situation at hand.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  True 39. Duty-based ethical standards often come from religious precepts.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  True 40. Religious rules generally are absolute with respect to the behavior of their adherents.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  True 41. Ethical reasoning is the process through which an individual rationalizes whatever action he or she chooses to take.   a. True   b. False ANSWER:  False PART 2: Short Answer Questions 42. Recreation & Sports Equipment Corporation sells a product that is capable of seriously injuring consumers who misuse it in a foreseeable way. Does the firm owe an ethical duty to take this product off the market? What conflicts might arise if the firm stops selling this product? ANSWER:  Ethical behavior can sometimes generate sufficient good will to warrant practicing it out of a desire for increased profits. By the same token, unethical behavior can sometimes generate enough bad publicity to warrant avoiding it out of the same desire. A business firm’s activities that are perceived as ethical and receive wide publicity can benefit the firm’s owners in the short run-and even in the long run if the firm’s enhanced public image continues to attract more consumers to its products. There is nothing unethical about making a profit. It is the behavior that generates the profit that can be questionable. Business ethics thus has a practical element. A business firm should act in its best interest. A firm interested in profits should also be 44. Sebastian was the manager of Thai Bistro, a restaurant specializing in Southeast Asian foods. Sebastian opened a bank account in Thai Bistro’s name, signing the account signature card as “owner.” Umeko, who was often at Thai Bistro and had free access to its office, told others that she was “an owner” and “a partner.” She also opened a bank account in Thai Bistro’s name, and signed the account signature card as “owner.” Sebastian told Vijay, the owner of Wong Noodles, Inc., that Umeko was a member of a partnership that owned Thai Bistro. On this basis, Wong Noodles delivered its goods to Thai Bistro on credit. In fact, Thai Bistro was owned by a corporation. When the unpaid account totaled more than $10,000, Wong Noodles filed a suit against Umeko to collect. On what basis might Umeko be liable for the debt? ANSWER:  The theory under which Umeko would most likely be liable for Thai Bistro’s debt to Wong Noodles is partnership by estoppel. The first requirement of this theory is a representation, by a nonpartner or by another with the nonpartner’s consent, that the nonpartner is a partner.  The second requirement is reliance on that representation. In this case, Wong Noodles could prove both elements. Both Sebastian and Umeko made representations with respect to Umeko’s status in relation to Thai Bistro—they both signed bank cards as “owner,” Umeko was often at Thai Bistro and had free access to its office, Umeko told others that she was a “partner” in the business, which is what Sebastian also told Vijay. As for the reliance element, Wong Noodles extended credit to Thai Bistro only because Wong Noodles believed that Thai Bistro was owned by a partnership. 45. Fresco and Garcia form a partnership—HVAC Pros. Garcia’s capital contribution is $10,000, and Fresco’s is $15,000. The partnership agreement provides that profits are to be shared, with 40 percent for Garcia and 60 percent for Fresco. Later, Garcia makes a $10,000 loan to the partnership when it needs working capital. When the partnership is dissolved, its assets are $50,000, and its debts are $8,000. How should the assets be distributed? ANSWER:  On the dissolution and winding up of a partnership, the order of liability payment of the assets is as follows: (a) debts owed to partnership creditors, including partners; and (b) capital contributions of partners and profits as provided or, in the absence of an agreement, equally [UPA 807]. In this question, the partnership’s creditors would be paid $8,000 first, leaving a balance of $42,000 from the $50,000.  Next, Garcia would be paid $10,000 for the loan, or advance, leaving $32,000. From this amount, Garcia would receive $10,000 and Fresco $15,000 as payment for their capital contributions, leaving a balance of $7,000. The $7,000 would be split as profits, with 40 percent going to Garcia ($2,800) and 60 percent to Fresco ($4,200). 46. Northwest Energy Company is subject to mandatory workers’ compensation laws in the states in which it does business. Odele and Phelps work for Northwest Energy as part of a crew that travels to remote locations to repair broken pumps and other damaged equipment. At a distant site, Odele is injured in an accident that is entirely Phelps’s fault. Odele files a claim for workers’ compensation. Should the claim be granted? What would be Northwest Energy’s best defense against it? ANSWER:  Odele’s claim should probably be granted. Northwest Energy’s best defense in this situation, as in all workers’ compensation cases, is that Odele’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment. That defense would not likely be successful here, however. Under workers’ compensation laws, employers are strictly liable without regard to whether or not they are at fault. Even if the employer is not negligent, he or she is liable if an employee’s injury arose out of and in the course of employment. “Liability” in this context means that an injured employee is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for his or her injury. An injury must be work-related, arising out of activity that is normal for the kind of job involved. “In the course of employment” means that the employee was either at work or performing work at a different location. That a co-worker caused an injury to an employee does not block the employee’s recovery of workers’ compensation benefits. Also, although an employee is not covered while driving to work from home, the employee is covered while performing a work-related service at an off-site location. 47. National Auto Parts Company runs an after-market auto parts-replacement company. Most of National Auto Parts’s business is done during the spring and summer. The company hires a large temporary workforce during its busiest times. Occasionally, a position opens for an individual with highly specialized skills, particularly to operate and maintain the company’s inventory control systems. Can National Auto Parts hire noncitizens for its temporary, seasonal work? Can the company hire a noncitizen with special skills for certain jobs? If so, what procedures must the employer follow in both situations to do this hiring? If not, how can National Auto Parts be assured that it is hiring only citizens? ANSWER:  It is illegal to hire for work in the United States a person who is not authorized to work here. Thus, under no circumstances can an employer legally hire a noncitizen who is in the United States unlawfully. But an employer may hire a noncitizen who is a lawful permanent resident. The principal responsibility to verify an individual’s identity and eligibility to work rests with the employer. The U. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) supplies a form—Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification—that an employer must complete within three days of hiring an employee (and retain for three years). An employer has some defenses against alleged violations but is otherwise subject to penalties for illegally employing noncitizens. Lawful permanent residency can be proved by an I-551 Alien Registration Receipt, or “green card.” Subject to certain strict requirements, an employer may apply for a “green card” for a noncitizen. Persons who immigrate to the United States to work include those with special skills, such as an individual who might qualify to fill the job with National Auto Parts in this question. To hire such an individual who is not otherwise authorized to work here, an employer must petition the CIS. The employer can obtain a visa for a person to work in the United States in a highly qualified, specialty occupation as part of the H-1B visa program.

Was this document helpful?
This is a Premium Document. Some documents on Studocu are Premium. Upgrade to Premium to unlock it.

BLaw Final Answer Key

Course: Business Law (LEB 323)

38 Documents
Students shared 38 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?

This is a preview

Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages
  • Access to all documents

  • Get Unlimited Downloads

  • Improve your grades

Upload

Share your documents to unlock

Already Premium?
Business Law Final Answer Key
PART 1: Multiple Choice and T/F Questions
1. Louann pushes Molly, who falls and breaks her wrist. Louann is liable for the injury
a. if Louann intended to push Moly.
b. only if Louann did not intend to break Moly’s wrist.
c. only if Louann had a bad motive for pushing Moly.
d. only if Louann intended to break Moly’s wrist.
ANSWER: a
2. Power Trucking Company operates a fleet of fuel trucks. When one of the trucks is positioned
to receive a load, it strikes a storage tank owned by Quality Fuel, Inc. For the cost of repairing the
damage to the tank, Quality Fuel is most likely to be awarded
a. compensatory
damages.
b. punitive damages.
c. contingency fees.
d. general damages.
ANSWER: a
3. Oxley throws a rock intending to hit Pieter but misses and hits Ricardo who sustains an injury.
Ricardo can most likely recover the cost of his injury from Oxley in a suit based on the tort theory
of
a. battery.
b. conversion.
c. invasion of privacy.
d. trespass.
ANSWER: a
4. After a dinner at Rosario’s Italian Café, Susie believes that she was overcharged and shoves
Theo, the waiter. Theo sues Susie, alleging that the shove was a battery. Susis is liable
a. if Rosario’s did not actually overcharge Susis.
b. if the shove was offensive.
c. if Susis acted out of malice.
d. under no circumstances—there was no physical injury.
ANSWER: b
5. Jon wants to buy Kim’s land, but she refuses to sell. Jon begins using subpoenas, court orders,
and other formal legal procedures in an unrelenting effort to force Kim to sell. This is
a. abuse of process.
b. appropriation.
c. wrongful interference with a contractual
relationship.
d. not a tort.

Why is this page out of focus?

This is a Premium document. Become Premium to read the whole document.

Why is this page out of focus?

This is a Premium document. Become Premium to read the whole document.

Why is this page out of focus?

This is a Premium document. Become Premium to read the whole document.