Skip to document

Acprof oso 9780198254744

hello
Course

Business Psychology (BPSY106)

9 Documents
Students shared 9 documents in this course
University

HELP University

Academic year: 2021/2022
Uploaded by:
0followers
14Uploads
0upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Causation in Legal Theory

Page 1 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxfordscholarship). (c) CopyrighRights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of at Oxford University Press, 2015. All monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see University of Victoria; date: 31 March 2016 oxfordscholarship/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber:

Causation in the Law

H. L. A. Hart and Tony Honoré Print publication date: 1985 Print ISBN-13: 9780198254744 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012 DOI: 10/acprof:oso/9780198254744.

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely

Causation in Legal Theory

H. L. A. Hart DOI:10/acprof:oso/9780198254744. The most frequent type of causal question which courts face is whether a human action or omission caused some specific harm; but even this one form of question may be relevant to legal responsibility in different ways. In criminal law this question usually has to be answered because criminal offences are often defined in simple terms as acts causing specific harms: in such cases a causal connection between some action of the accused and the specified harm must be shown in order to establish the existence of liability. Meanwhile, the task of` the jurist is not to search for general policies but rather to reveal the true character of the issues wrapped up in the blurred notions of causation and the strategy and procedure involved in their presentation to courts. Keywords: jurist, liability causal questions, causation , harm, legal responsibility, causal connection,

University Press Scholarship Online

Oxford Scholarship Online

Causation in Legal Theory

Page 2 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxfordscholarship). (c) CopyrighRights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of at Oxford University Press, 2015. All monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see University of Victoria; date: 31 March 2016 oxfordscholarship/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber:

search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter. Please, subscribe or login to access full text content. If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian. To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.

Was this document helpful?

Acprof oso 9780198254744

Course: Business Psychology (BPSY106)

9 Documents
Students shared 9 documents in this course

University: HELP University

Was this document helpful?
Causation in Legal Theory
Page 1 of 2
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015. All
Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a
monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber:
University of Victoria; date: 31 March 2016
Causation in the Law
H. L. A. Hart and Tony Honoré
Print publication date: 1985
Print ISBN-13: 9780198254744
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.001.0001
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access
the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely
Causation in Legal Theory
H. L. A. Hart
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.003.0005
The most frequent type of causal question which courts face is
whether a human action or omission caused some specific
harm; but even this one form of question may be relevant to
legal responsibility in different ways. In criminal law this
question usually has to be answered because criminal offences
are often defined in simple terms as acts causing specific
harms: in such cases a causal connection between some action
of the accused and the specified harm must be shown in order
to establish the existence of liability. Meanwhile, the task of`
the jurist is not to search for general policies but rather to
reveal the true character of the issues wrapped up in the
blurred notions of causation and the strategy and procedure
involved in their presentation to courts.
Keywords: causal questions, harm, legal responsibility, causal connection,
jurist, liability, causation
University Press Scholarship Online
Oxford Scholarship Online