Skip to document

Week 3 tutorial - property law

property law
Course

Foundations of Property Law (LAWS12065)

12 Documents
Students shared 12 documents in this course
Academic year: 2020/2021
Uploaded by:
Anonymous Student
This document has been uploaded by a student, just like you, who decided to remain anonymous.
Central Queensland University

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Question 1) How to answer an easement question Step 1) Establish if it’s an easement by using the elements in re Ellenborough park Dominant and serviant tenement Must benefit dominant tenement Can’t be broad in subject matter (re Ellenborough park)

\Step 2) common and statutory abandonment (cant have 1 without the other) an issue that the court considers are if the easement is abandoned or obsolete. A key thing to consider is abandonment, it was with apparent agreement so it isn’t clear if its been registered. An easement is created by using lta (land title act) 82-83, compulsory acquisition, s180 implied by courts order pla. Step 3) registration must be done in writing section 11 pla, it has to be registered s82,83 lta. When something is abandoned use treweeke v thirty six Wolseley road py ltd (The high court wont step in to show intent of abandonment and must be significant circumstances to prove it). If something is obsolete like an access point then go through 181 then subsection a and c, d. was it a legal pathway, was it a public interest, is their intention to abandon by using another pathway? (Abandonment is an intention and obsolete refers to usage (when it doesn’t benefit the dominant tenant ‘I’ll use another time’) Omitted easements (see Wallace 10.390-10) Step 1-4 characteristics re ellenbourough park A right of recreation step 4 needs to be clear, on the basis that it’s a right of way it is sufficiently secured. There is a dominant and servient tenement ect Step 2- registration It’s a registered easement hats in writing that is not on the register, look at indefeasibility Step 3- indefeasibility (only relates to easements that aren’t registered, ect) 184 & 185. An omitted easement is an exception to indefeasibility. He would be subject to that particular easement seen in 185 (3) how does it relate to the facts? A- Easement was in existence when it was first burdened ect B- C- Has been an error of the register A case reference being c would be christopoulos v kells

Was this document helpful?

Week 3 tutorial - property law

Course: Foundations of Property Law (LAWS12065)

12 Documents
Students shared 12 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?
Question 1)
How to answer an easement question
Step 1) Establish if it’s an easement by using the elements in re Ellenborough park
Dominant and serviant tenement
Must benefit dominant tenement
Can’t be broad in subject matter
(re Ellenborough park)
\Step 2) common and statutory abandonment (cant have 1 without the other) an issue that the
court considers are if the easement is abandoned or obsolete. A key thing to consider is
abandonment, it was with apparent agreement so it isn’t clear if its been registered. An easement is
created by using lta (land title act) 82-83, compulsory acquisition, s180 implied by courts order pla.
Step 3) registration must be done in writing section 11 pla, it has to be registered s82,83 lta.
When something is abandoned use treweeke v thirty six Wolseley road py ltd (The high court wont
step in to show intent of abandonment and must be significant circumstances to prove it).
If something is obsolete like an access point then go through 181 then subsection a and c, d. was it a
legal pathway, was it a public interest, is their intention to abandon by using another pathway?
(Abandonment is an intention and obsolete refers to usage (when it doesn’t benefit the dominant
tenant ‘I’ll use another time’)
Omitted easements (see Wallace 10.390-10.396)
Step 1-4 characteristics re ellenbourough park
A right of recreation step 4 needs to be clear, on the basis that its a right of way it is sufficiently
secured.
There is a dominant and servient tenement ect
Step 2- registration
Its a registered easement hats in writing that is not on the register, look at indefeasibility
Step 3- indefeasibility (only relates to easements that aren’t registered, ect) 184 & 185. An omitted
easement is an exception to indefeasibility. He would be subject to that particular easement seen in
185 (3) how does it relate to the facts?
A- Easement was in existence when it was first burdened ect
B-
C- Has been an error of the register
A case reference being c would be christopoulos v kells