Skip to document

Lecture 5 - The Criminal World PICT103

Lecture 5 - The Criminal World PICT103 lecture notes
Course

Introduction to Criminology (PICT103)

125 Documents
Students shared 125 documents in this course
Academic year: 2019/2020
Uploaded by:
Anonymous Student
This document has been uploaded by a student, just like you, who decided to remain anonymous.
Macquarie University

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Society (economic systems, institutions, etc.)

Community (local attitudes, class

values, etc.)

Situation (immediate

environment and context) Individual

(offender profile, characteristics, etc.)

Lecture 5: The Criminal World

Durkheim & social norms  Father of sociology Emile Durkheim (1857-1917)  Social norms are “cultural phenomena that prescribe and proscribe behaviour in certain circumstances” o Social norms – rules that help us operate as a society o Formal (laws) or informal (dress, hygiene, speech)  Essentially all of the informal rules and commonly accepted ways of doing things  Differ from, though ideally include, laws (legal norms)

Anomie  Anomie = state of normlessness o Invented by Durkheim studying motivations behind suicide in countries with high rates  Occurs when societies are destabilised, don’t feel responsibility anymore  Particularly during times of sudden change: o War o Post-conflict/political transition o Rapid technological transformation o Economic fluctuation (boom/bust) – even development can increase crime as it shakes up deeply held social norms, but don’t really see it in western countries  E. Mexico was centralised and in a decade it was opened  Breakdown of usual community bonds - people have no social norms to follow  As a result they act in their own interest = crime

o When free of norms that ‘oppress’ us, we become selfish e. looting during riots Strain theory - the American Dream  Developed by sociologist Robert Merton (1910-2003)  Builds upon anomie and also emphasises the importance of social values, particularly culturally valued goals  American Dream – material success, fame, fortune, etc.  ‘Anybody can make it America’  Notion of American dream builds up strain because not everyone can make it  Society started placing such a high value on material accomplishment  Dissonance between what is valued/promised (wealth, opulence) and what people can achieve creates strain o Creates stress and flexibility towards acting in legal ways

Strain theory - the American reality  Huge wealth inequality  Inequitable access to opportunity structures (education, employment, etc.)  Social strain comes about when there is a mismatch between culturally valued goals and legitimate means to achieve them  Minimum wage = $7 (Aus - $9)  High strain = high crime  Relative deprivation – having less than adjacent people/classes

Strain theory – five reactions  How do people respond to strain/unfairness? o Conformity – accepts approved goals, pursues them through approved means o Innovation – accepts approved goals; uses disapproved means.  E. gambling, fraud, drug dealing o Ritualism – abandons society’s goals; conforms to approved mean.  Realise goals are unattainable, abandon, but still get job/uni/traffic/expected o Retreatism – abandons approved goals and approved means.  I will never achieve this so I’ll just have a good time, no job o Rebellion – challenges approved goals and approved means.  Punks, challenge narrative of goals/everyday ritualistic narrative

Strain theory – implications  Helps explain different levels of crime in different contexts  Highlights the importance of social inclusion, fairness and equality of opportunity (education, employment, etc.) – a ‘fair go’  Also the value of non-material goals that contribute to social status and feelings of respect (e. family, friendship, sporting achievement, artistic expression, etc.)  What do we value most in Australia? Money? Mateship? Have these values changed over time?

Social disorganisation – Part II  Developed by researchers at the university of Chicago  Division of cities into different areas based on class, length of residency and community cohesion  Shift away from universal analysis to focus specifically on delinquent areas: slums, ghettos  Criminogenic factors related to place

 Crime and economic class are strongly correlated - prisons are full of poor not rich people  High crime rates are associated with economic marginalisation (poverty and long-term unemployment), in combination with other factors: o Family instability o Lack of education o Poor housing  Underclass = people excluded from legitimate economy  Links to social disorganisation

The ‘dangerous’ classes  ‘Law’ is used as a tool of the rich to control and subordinate other classes  Poor people are disproportionately targeted by the police and the broader criminal justice system  Deviancy of the working and under-classes are criminalised  Deviancy and harmful behaviours of the rich are not – critical criminology  Limited means to challenge legal determinations

The prison-industrial complex  Refers to the symbiotic relationship between private (for-profit) prisons and political establishment  Taxpayers pay prison corporations for each person in custody  Overwhelmingly the poor and underclass are incarcerated  Prisoners may be required to work in custody - 23 cents per hour!  7 private prisons in Australia

The prison-industrial complex  Unlike state run corrections, private prisons have a vested interest in increasing prisoner numbers  Prison corporations influence penal policy directly by lobbying politicians to increase sentences (mandatory sentences, ‘zero tolerance’ policing, ‘three strikes’ policies)  This provides more money to prison corporations which can further their expansion, increasing penalties further - and so the cycle goes

Final thoughts  In addition to individual factors, crime is influenced by social structures, including: o Class o Opportunity o Inequality and relative deprivation o Cultural values o Operation of the criminal justice system o And political/economic systems  If unfairness is built into society, how does this affect ideas about who is responsible for crime?How do these ideas change our notions of who an offender is?

Was this document helpful?

Lecture 5 - The Criminal World PICT103

Course: Introduction to Criminology (PICT103)

125 Documents
Students shared 125 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?
Society
(economic systems, institutions, etc.)
Community
(local attitudes, class
values, etc.)
Situation
(immediate
environment and context)
Individual
(offender
profile,
characteristics,
etc.)
Lecture 5: The Criminal World
Durkheim & social
norms
Father of sociology Emile Durkheim (1857-1917)
Social norms are cultural phenomena that prescribe and proscribe behaviour in certain
circumstances”
oSocial norms – rules that help us operate as a society
oFormal (laws) or informal (dress, hygiene, speech)
Essentially all of the informal rules and commonly accepted ways of doing things
Differ from, though ideally include, laws (legal norms)
Anomie
Anomie = state of normlessness
oInvented by Durkheim studying motivations behind suicide in countries with high rates
Occurs when societies are destabilised, don’t feel responsibility anymore
Particularly during times of sudden change:
oWar
oPost-conflict/political transition
oRapid technological transformation
oEconomic fluctuation (boom/bust) – even development can increase crime as it shakes
up deeply held social norms, but don’t really see it in western countries
E.g. Mexico was centralised and in a decade it was opened
Breakdown of usual community bonds - people have no social norms to follow
As a result they act in their own interest = crime