- Information
- AI Chat
Was this document helpful?
The so-called ‘Unwritten Constitution’ is a key concept in the UK. Examine this concept and explain the possible advantages and disadvantages of such a constitution
Module: Public Law
209 Documents
Students shared 209 documents in this course
University: Middlesex University London
Was this document helpful?
Feryal Fekri
The so-called ‘Unwritten Constitution’ is a key concept in the UK.
Examine this concept and explain the possible advantages and disadvantages of such a
constitution.
As Barnett says: “A constitution is a set of rules which govern the organization.”
Constitution has three key elements which are referred to in Hood Philips and Jackson’s
definition of constitution: “A constitution is a system of law, custom, and conventions
which define the composition and the powers of organs in the state and regulates the
relationship between each various organ to one another and to the public citizen.”
Constitutions in simple words establish how the country is run. Constitution comes into
two forms: written and unwritten. A written constitution is where all the laws are collated
into one single or a set of documents. Most countries have adopted a written constitution
such as the USA and almost every other country. On the other hand, only three countries
exist with a unwritten constitution; The UK, Israel, and New Zealand. In unwritten, the
laws are not collated in one single or a set of documents. The UK’s constitution is based
on its sources which are: Common Law, Statue Law, Royal Prerogative, EU Law,
International Law, Constitutional Conventions. Nonetheless, there are disadvantage and
advantages to keeping an unwritten constitution and this essay will examine those
advantages and disadvantages.
Most written constitutions are normally adopted after a fundamental break with the
previous regime and they represent a new fresh start for the country such as the
revolution in French in 1789, Germany defeating in war in 1919, Nigeria gaining its
independence from a colonial rule in 1951. It is often argued that UK did not have any
major break in its governance so there has never been a need to switch to written
constitution. As quoted by William Hague “there is no need for a written constitution as
we already have internal stability, and Britain has been well served by its unwritten
constitution.”
1. Advantage:
The first advantage is in relation to flexibility. By having no written constitution, it
allows a degree of flexibility, which unlike the American Constitution is not limiting
due to its rigidity. This is particularly advantageous in keeping the constitution up to
date in the case of cultural morality of the public. Amending or repealing laws is not
complicated and all it takes is an Act passed by Parliament. Barnett describes the UK
constitution as “the height of flexibility.” Flexibility itself comes with two advantages
for the UK constitution. First Parliament can meet the needs of the current society by
passing an Act such as the Marriage (same-sex couples) Act 2013.This indicates that
the law is up to date. Secondly, as there is no entrenchment, Parliament can respond
to dangerous situations quicker and easier such as the Firearm (Amendment) Act
Students also viewed
- Controls on Royal Prerogative
- Judicial review Problem Question Answer
- DISTINCTION - Impact of HRA in the UK
- Public LAW Formative 3 - This is a step by step process on how to solve problem questions about judicial
- Prerogative Powers Essay Plan
- Examine the meaning of the prerogative and the extent to which prerogative powers are subject to control by Parliament.