Skip to document

War Crimes and aggression

Lecture Notes
Course

Global Criminology (CRIM:3415)

30 Documents
Students shared 30 documents in this course
Academic year: 2017/2018
Uploaded by:
Anonymous Student
This document has been uploaded by a student, just like you, who decided to remain anonymous.
University of Iowa

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Lecture 3/27 – Global CRIM War Crimes and Aggression

War Crimes  Crimes committed by individuals and states during the times of armed conflict and crimes of international aggression by the state Justice in war  Law of war does not exist 1st positon: war is not about right or wrong its about success or failure 2nd positon: war is never justifiable Just war theory  Under certain circumstances war is justified  Codes of war  Just cause vs just means Just Cause  Laws that define when it is acceptable to go to war, defined by the UN charter (self- defense or authorization) domestic procedures Just means  What soldiers and commanders can do, defined by Geneva convention (1949)

Just Cause 1. Just authority: only just and legitimate political entity can initiate war 2. Just cause: the reason (self-defense, provocation, support of an ally) 3. Just intention: sticking to the original cause and withdrawing once it is achieved 4. Last resort war is morally permissible only when there are no other ways to achieve the just cause Just means 1. Proportionality: the degree of force must be measured against the force required to correct just cause and limited by just intention 2. Discrimination: between combatants and non-combatants 3. Responsibility Country is not responsible for side effects as long as a. Intention is good b. Bad effects are unintended c. The good outweighs the damage Just means  Geneva conventions and their additional protocols  Regulate conduct of armed forces and limit their effects  Special protections for those who do not take part in hostilities  Humane treatment for prisoners of war  Relief and protection for the wounded Just means: How effective are the laws of war?  Multiple violations  Can prevent unnecessary suffering  Give a standard for judging the behavior post conflict

Domestic Legality  Article 1, Section 2 & 8 of the constitution a. The president is the commander in chief can declare war b. Has to present justification and plausible path to victory in congress c. Congress has to vote, approve the war, and allocate funding  War powers resolution (1973): president has to report to congress within 48 hours if the US armed forces and introduced into a conflict Persistence of unconstitutional military actions by the US  US congress has declared war only 5 times (all before 1945)  Yet, US has committed forces hundreds of time  Called a variety of things (limited military engagement, targeted campaign, armed conflict)  Complicity of congress Why do you think the US does not declare war anymore?  Importance of secrecy and quick action in the cold war era  Ability to pass by congress  Vietnam  Flexibility in regards to rules Why do War Crimes Happen?  Stress of combat  Demonization/ dehumanization of the enemy  Tolerance of bloodshed  Revenge for personal losses Milgram’s Experiment  1963  obedience to authority vs personal conscience  it is easier to torture people than we think  were war criminals just following orders?  Supervisor told participants to continue administering shock to other participants  65% of participants delivered maximum shock  this shows us that when told to do something we are willing to go farther  explains torture  holocaust

RULES OF WAR ARE VIOLATED ALL THE TIME

Was this document helpful?

War Crimes and aggression

Course: Global Criminology (CRIM:3415)

30 Documents
Students shared 30 documents in this course

University: University of Iowa

Was this document helpful?
Lecture 3/27 – Global CRIM War Crimes and Aggression
War Crimes
Crimes committed by individuals and states during the times of armed conflict and
crimes of international aggression by the state
Justice in war
Law of war does not exist
1st positon: war is not about right or wrong its about success or failure
2nd positon: war is never justifiable
Just war theory
Under certain circumstances war is justified
Codes of war
Just cause vs just means
Just Cause
Laws that define when it is acceptable to go to war, defined by the UN charter (self-
defense or authorization) domestic procedures
Just means
What soldiers and commanders can do, defined by Geneva convention (1949)
Just Cause
1. Just authority: only just and legitimate political entity can initiate war
2. Just cause: the reason (self-defense, provocation, support of an ally)
3. Just intention: sticking to the original cause and withdrawing once it is achieved
4. Last resort war is morally permissible only when there are no other ways to achieve the
just cause
Just means
1. Proportionality: the degree of force must be measured against the force required to
correct just cause and limited by just intention
2. Discrimination: between combatants and non-combatants
3. Responsibility Country is not responsible for side effects as long as
a. Intention is good
b. Bad effects are unintended
c. The good outweighs the damage
Just means
Geneva conventions and their additional protocols
Regulate conduct of armed forces and limit their effects
Special protections for those who do not take part in hostilities
Humane treatment for prisoners of war
Relief and protection for the wounded
Just means: How effective are the laws of war?
Multiple violations
Can prevent unnecessary suffering
Give a standard for judging the behavior post conflict