- Information
- AI Chat
This is a Premium Document. Some documents on Studocu are Premium. Upgrade to Premium to unlock it.
Was this document helpful?
This is a Premium Document. Some documents on Studocu are Premium. Upgrade to Premium to unlock it.
Arbitral rulling in south china sea
Course: Bachelor of Science in Accountancy (BSA)
999+ Documents
Students shared 6961 documents in this course
University: Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Was this document helpful?
This is a preview
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages
Access to all documents
Get Unlimited Downloads
Improve your grades
Already Premium?
Look for at least 3 reasons why the Arbitral ruling on South China Sea between China and the
Philippines was rendered in favor of the Philippines
The Philippines’ claims fell into four general categories. The ruling of the Tribunal on each
category of claims is summarized below:
1. The broadest claim was a challenge to China’s “nine-dash line
” covering most of the South
China Sea. China has never clarified
whether the line represents a claim to the islands within
the line and their adjacent waters; a boundary of national sovereignty over all the enclosed
waters (including, but not limited by, the land features inside the line); or a “historic” claim of
sovereignty or some other set of historic rights to the maritime space within the line. The
Philippines sought a declaration that the countries’ respective rights and obligations regarding
the waters, seabed, and maritime features of the South China Sea are governed by UNCLOS.
As such, China’s claims based on any “historic rights” to waters, seabed, and subsoil within
the nine-dash line are contrary to UNCLOS and invalid.
Holding
: UNCLOS “comprehensively” governs the parties’ respective rights to maritime
areas in the South China Sea. Therefore, to the extent China’s nine-dash line is a claim of
“historic rights” to the waters of the South China Sea, it is invalid.
Reasoning
: Whatever historic rights China may have had were extinguished when UNCLOS
was adopted, to the extent those rights were incompatible with UNCLOS.
2. The Philippines sought a determination as to whether certain land features in the Spratly
Islands claimed by both China and the Philippines are properly characterized as islands, rocks,
low tide elevations (LTEs), or submerged banks. Under UNCLOS, an “island” generates both
a territorial sea of 12 nautical miles and an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of up to 200
nautical miles, subject to delimitation of a maritime boundary with any other countries’
overlapping territorial seas or EEZs. A “rock” is entitled to a territorial sea no greater than 12
nautical miles, but not an EEZ. LTEs and submerged banks do not generate any such
entitlements.
Holding
: None of the features in the Spratly Islands generates an EEZ, nor can the Spratly
Islands generate an EEZ collectively as a unit. As such, the Tribunal declared certain areas are
within the Philippines’ EEZ and not overlapped by any possible Chinese entitlement.
Reasoning
: The baseline of analysis is what the features can sustain in their “natural
condition” (i.e., not after construction of artificial islands, installation of desalination plants,
etc.). Based on historical evidence, none of the features in the Spratly Islands can sustain
either a stable community of people or economic activity that is not dependent on outside
resources or purely extractive in nature. The current presence of personnel on the features is
dependent on outside support and does not reflect the capacity of the features in their natural
condition.
3. The Philippines sought a declaration that China violated UNCLOS by interfering with the
Philippines’ rights and freedoms within its EEZs. This includes preventing Philippine fishing
around Scarborough Shoal, violating UNCLOS’s environmental protection provisions through
Why is this page out of focus?
This is a Premium document. Become Premium to read the whole document.
Students also viewed
- 5 Issues OF THE World - help for students in their assignments in many subjects
- Articles OF Corporation lecture notes first semester
- Case study 8 problem Pathways out of poverty: Progresa/oportunidades in Mexico
- Pdfcoffee MC questions - Accounting (PDF Free)
- Notes Receivable- Interacc
- FAR 2 ACCOUNTINF FOR PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION LUMP-SUM Transcriptions